Telecoms, cable companies and search engines are fairly routinely asked to divulge information about their users’ activities (and even location in the case of wireless carriers) by the government and law enforcement. Disclosure of this information and the fact that they charge for these “spying†services would potentially upset or outrage users and badly damage their images as consumer friendly businesses.
http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-engaged-in-effort-to-remove-spying-guide-from-public-view-31428
Telecoms, cable companies and search engines are fairly routinely asked to divulge information about their users’ activities (and even location in the case of wireless carriers) by the government and law enforcement. Disclosure of this information and the fact that they charge for these “spying†services would potentially upset or outrage users and badly damage their images as consumer friendly businesses.
http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-engaged-in-effort-to-remove-spying-guide-from-public-view-31428
The main reason people like the concept of forming an SEO Monopoly is leverage. Traditional SEO is like putting all of your eggs into one basket. An SEO Monopoly is equivalent to owning multiple baskets. The odds of a the searcher finding out about your company or service are much greater if you are running an SEO Monopoly.
